Sachiko Kazama of "Tanaka Kakuei, Ichiro Ozawa and Akiko Sato mama" and VOCA 2010

"View of contemporary art "author-in VOCA show 2010 - new level"" starts from today, the selection commissioners who see Hideji Takashina (selection chairperson/Ohara Museum of Art director) Tadayasu Sakai (Setagaya Art Museum director)? Tatehata 晢 (National Museum of Art a chief)? Hongo Kunio (Tama Art University professor) Natsumi Araki (forest art museum curator)? Yuri Mitsuda (art critic)? Minami Shima Hiroshi (Prof.
Women's College of Fine Arts).

But it wasn't given to a Top prize in Mr. Sachiko Kazama's work unfortunately I like "Dai Nippon anti-aircraft soldier and 2670".

http://www.ueno-mori.org/voca/2010/outline.html Recommendation commissioner Matsui Green. (Art critic)?
Yoshizaki Genshou (Forest art museum of Sapporo art)?
Plum Mina (The Museum of Modern Art, Kamakura)?
Fukuzumi Cheap. (Art critic)?
Oshima Inscription capital (Suntory museum "Mt. Tenpo")?
Valley Record (Utsunomiya art museum)?
Nonaka Akira (Nagasaki-ken art museum)?
Haido. Masahiko (Aichi Prefectural Museum of Art)? Nobuyuki Okabe (Yamagata art museum)? Kenji Kubota (independent curator)? Kinoshita Chieko (Osaka University communication design center)? Yuusuke Minami (national new art museum)? Yuji Yamashita Toshihiro Asai of (Meiji Gakuin University) (Contemporary Art Center, Art Tower Mito)? A precious stone Masahiko (Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc.)? Toyomiyama Ai (Okinawa Prefectural Museum art museum)? Kazuo Yamawaki (Kinjo Gakuin University)? Masaki Yanagihara (Toyama-ken Indian ink painting art museum)? Sachie Kamitani (Hiroshima City Museum of Contemporary Art)? Ko Harada (Iwate prefectural art museum)? Chinzei Yoshimi (Museum of Contemporary Art, Tokyo) Koichi Wada (Miyagi Museum of Art)? Horimoto Akira (Tokyo opera city art gallery)? Yuichiro Takashima (Kanazawa art museum in the 21st century)? Takeshi Sakurai (Kumamoto-shi Museum of Contemporary Art)?
Hirose 就久 (Okayama Prefectural Museum of Art)? Kunio Hiramoto (Kyodo News)? Satoru Nagoya (journalist of fine arts)? Okazato Takashi (forest art museum in Ueno)? Yuki Kondo (international art center Aomori)? Hitoshi Izuhara (Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Art)? Oda Kakimi (art critic)? Koji Nakai (National Museum of Art)? Yoko Nose (Toyota-shi art museum)? Hanada. Shinichi (independent curator) ....................................

An article of my VOCA2010, as you can see:.

"A VOCA prize in 2010 and Miyake 砂織 win." http://www.art-it.asia/u/sfztpm/uAdJvVYj1agwEyWpTeFH/ About Miyake 砂織: "Neo-neo-girls @ Takahashi collection Hibiya 2/2" http://www.art-it.asia/u/sfztpm/Z6HIv0N5UmwQXblcFD78/ .....................................


It was booth in desert island production of last year's Tokyo art fair "TOKIA" that I saw Mr. Sachiko Kazama's work for the first time. I came to have the interest to this Japanese young female author after Mr. Kazama had the explanation on his own.
A problem of "relation between Japanese and Tanaka Kakuei" stands out rare in her multivalence.

I introduced Chim↑ Pom members, Sachiko Kazama, Ryo Umekawa rise, Koji Nishio, Makoto Aida and Hiroko Okada by an article in around December of last year.
"Chim↑ Pom, Koji Nishio, Sachiko Kazama and Ryo Umekawa rise" http://www.art-it.asia/u/sfztpm/YAFTJDG93KUX1MCZ0HEh/ Sachiko Kazama a.k.a C'mon Sachiko ;-)) Desert island production http://www.art-it.asia/f/mujinto3/ http://www.mujin-to.com And it was reported quietly about the "safe turn" of Tanaka former prime minister by today's newspaper.
The article to which you're referring: News of death: Ms. Akiko Sato renews the "safe turn" of 81 years old = Tanaka former prime minister at one thirty-one on March 13, 2010: March 13 Nine forty-four.

Akiko Sato called "queen of Koshiyama meeting" etc. by a secretary of Tanaka Kakuei former prime minister (Sato* well, it works.), make, but, on the 11th, I have died of a hospital in Minato-ku, Tokyo for lung cancer. I was 81 years old. On the 12th, a funeral has been finished only by a near relative. A chief mourner, eldest daughter Atsuko (Well, I arrive.), make.
Is Mr. Sato about 2 years before?11 Japan and North Korea and the condition had RA lung cancer, and changed suddenly.
From Kashiwazaki-shi, Niigata. I became a secretary at the edge where I helped a former prime minister with election activity in 1952. After that I served as an accountability person of former prime minister's body politic "Koshiyama meeting". When it was called "the safe turn of Koshiyama meeting" from the enormous influence, the Ichiro Ozawa Democratic Party of Japan secretary-generals who were a mainstay of Tanaka party yearned with "mama".
An office was closed by Makiko Tanaka former foreign minister of 85 years when a former prime minister was down with an illness and my daughter, and after being dismissed, a body politic was being supervised.
Mr. Ozawa who heard news of death (to bran) ran to the hospital where Mr. Sato passed away at noon for 11 days. With the remains at the front, "It had been kind to a mama for a long time.", I say that tears were being shed.

http://mainichi.jp/select/today/news/20100313k0000m040142000c.html My Tanaka Kakuei diary An author: Akiko Sato (Sato Well, it works.) Shincho library and 2001 (Shinchosha and 1994) \476 http://www.amazon.co.jp/gp/product/410148631X?ie=UTF8&tag=takumi%5Fshouten-22&linkCode=as2&camp=247&creative=1211&creativeASIN=410148631X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I'll borrow this chance and introduce an existence sense of "Akiko Sato" to a young person through the explanation of some blogs:.

"My Tanaka Kakuei diary" An author: Akiko Sato (Sato Well, it works.) Shincho library and 2001 (Shinchosha and 1994) \476 Author's brief summary of career - Kashiwazaki-shi, Niigata hometown. Graduated from Niigata prefectural Kashiwazaki women's middle school. Tokyo female college dropping out. I become Tanaka Kakuei secretary from 1952 (1952) year and after that, play an active part as an integration person in charge of a body politic such as Koshiyama meeting and a related branch office. I supervise "investigating committee of politics and economics" and endeavor after Masaji Tanaka's succession at present.


A diary of a lady who meets Tanaka Kakuei called the rare Prime Minister after the war.
Tanaka Kakuei becomes a congressman by 28 years old.
And there was a writer in a relation close to Tanaka beyond the viewpoint as the social secretary all the while.
Supremacy and a historical origin of Koshiyama meeting.It was also called Tanaka Kakuei's safe turn, but it doesn't stop at that and she's having Tanaka's child.

Tanaka Kakuei becomes a congressman by elementary school graduation, and shows management by excellent memory and small care, and is the person who became the Prime Minister finally, but an impression of the one involved in Lockheed scandal is rather strong.
It'll be a difficult thing that I have gone out of only the elementary school and am living by the political world.
I'm certain that there was various difficulty for the political activity which is dealing with a bureaucrat, a financier and a politician.

This note isn't Tanaka Kakuei's biography.
A diary of the lady who supported Tanaka Kakuei at the shadow thoroughly.
Tanaka is a superman and it's natural to be drawn by a super-good man.

A writer is doing twice's marriage though he does work related to Tanaka.
The first marriage seems to have had no relation to Tanaka Kakuei so much, but I depend on Tanaka after I get married.
But without working, my husband ran to other women, so I divorced.
I did and remarried for a while, but without going well, I divorce.
She was flooded with the political world to the hilt already at the time, and Tanaka became the Minister of Posts and Telecommunications.
The men with the big ability stand around the writer, and it appears, and I'm certain that it was exciting substantial every day.

A writer asked home life to heal loneliness in a far-off country.
They also seem to have wanted the warm family above all.
That led to remarriage.
And an office worker of a first-class company is chosen as a remarriage partner.
I'm certain that a title of a first-class company found to guarantee a life.
But it's impossible to be able to compare the men who stake itself on something and an office worker.

An office worker life will be that it looked ordinary from her every day circled by a politician.
A writer is talking about his husband with an untidy small-scale man, but there should be also cause in writer's correspondence for that.
If there is a writer in common people's life, this marriage would continue.
Because common people are beyond enough by an office worker of a first-class enterprise.
But a minister is seeing much big-name politician in the neighborhood for a writer.
An eye can train a man and I'm certain that I compared the husband with them.
In the long run it was a divorce.

At the time, a writer gives birth to a girl.
The child named Atsuko keeps growing smoothly.

Daughter's birth - that was the moment it was paradise. Even a life is.I thought something important was given.
There was no intention which asks the politician who will have that in the future for recognition. P51 Tanaka Kakuei has a child called Makiko Tanaka between the lawful wife.
Besides there are also 2 children who acknowledge.
I'm not certain that there was a person who doesn't know him to have loved many ladies by various fields by an overt secret.
But a topic about Tanaka Kakuei's child has not come out at all in mass communication then.
Though it was well-known fact who a father of writer's child was of course, it wasn't discussed thoroughly at all.
Indeed such constitution is old, and when I'm an ordinary man, it would be under big fire.
Something in the power is also protected in today.

The life when I have lived can't be denied.
Oh, it's done, and, and, when I lived in territory as politics, the denial can also lead to politician's supported denial.
A writer has fallen into a figure called Tanaka who confused a life as a politician with a personal life.
Tanaka Kakuei is the previous modern people of whom an individual isn't independent.

A writer was the previous modern people, too.
The sense was shared each other there, and the sense followed the immediately public world.
So a writer would be able to finish devoting himself to the role of the shadow while making the physical intercourse a proof of trust.
If there isn't physical intercourse between these men and women, 2 people wouldn't be able to build this much relationship of mutual trust and ill feeling wouldn't be incurred from Makiko Tanaka who is lawful wife's child.

Lockheed scandal isn't having the influence which is so on a relation between 2 people.
In fact, adversity is strengthening a relation between 2 people.
The writer's life is upset by Tanaka Kakuei's dying early.
When the person himself dies, formal on the form is given priority to, and the connection by the intangible affection becomes extinct.
Tanaka says before life, that he doted on Atsuko Sato like my child.
But Makiko Tanaka is a proper heir and the thing which takes Tanaka Kakuei's justice over isn't permitted by Atsuko Sato.
Akiko Sato is being forgot existence in now.

When it's judged from other ones, a relation between 2 people is seen as the ugly one with which official and personal affairs were confused.
But very dense time should pass between 2 people, and I'm certain that it was a life of paradise.
Everyone else has no experiences which trusted each other, cooperated and topped the Prime Minister like this.
For a lady, manNI would be very very full time.

It's being transmitted from this note well that a writer was informing Tanaka Kakuei about absolute trust.
The value as the men and women's love-hate relationship and the public person is different.
Tanaka Kakuei as a politician has much criticism.
But a person's of man doesn't have a word to say but he says that the figure called trusted Tanaka Kakuei was this much happy.
(2003.4.18) http://www.rin-5.net/251-500/275-watashi_tanaka.htm ____________________________________________________________________ And "open" made of a secret of the relations between Japan and the United States making postwar Japanese politics be confused finally by divine protection of a new government as you can see.

In blog in ARTiT, "light article": "Change" http://www.art-it.asia/u/sfztpm/VGQ3rtpFJ7SiYWfc291d/ "Change 2" http://www.art-it.asia/u/sfztpm/qbczBKND8oF94AxprVH1/ Japan and U.S. secret treaty: Knowledgeable person committee report Point (its 1) The "knowledgeable person committee about" a so-called "secret treaty" problem which started on November 27 of last year by entrustment of Okada Katsuya Minister of Foreign Affairs has probed four investigation reports inside the Ministry of Foreign Affairs about "secret treaty" for about 3 months as well as has inspected through original document acquisition and an interview to the person concerned. A point on an investigation report inside the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and a paper of the knowledgeable person committee was gathered. (For a title, both, at that time)<1> the introduction of nuclear weapons secret treaty which is at the time of a security treaty revise for 60 years A secret treaty about a stop is placed with a starting point of 4 secret treaty which became an investigation object some time of the transit of nuclear weapons ship. Fujiyama Aiichiro Minister of Foreign Affairs and MacArthur rice ambassador to Japan make an undisclosed document as "record of discussion" in Japan-US Security Treaty revise negotiations in January, 1960, and I say maybe that this was passage of territorial waters of a transit of nuclear weapons ship and understanding of a secret between the Japan and U.S. which excludes a stop from a target of a charitable work of two governments.
The interest of Japan where a NCND (Neither affirmation nor denial were done about existence of a nuclear weapon.) policy and an antinuclear opinion of USA which makes the nuclear where one be ambiguous are held was identical, and "record of discussion" was made. Passage of a transit of nuclear weapons ship and a stop, preliminary 協The argument stuffed in 60 years concerning whether you made the subject of a discussion wasn't done, but Ohira Masayoshi Minister of Foreign Affairs Reischauer rice ambassador after a while to Japan in 63 "tacit agreement" was formed gradually, and it hardened from 68 to 69. "Tacit agreement" is interpreted as a secret treaty of a broad sense, and task for "the target by which a stop of a transit of nuclear weapons ship is a charitable work" and the Japanese Government which continued false explaining is also taken after that to.
◇ The Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2 made copies of "record of discussion" and documents it seems (only English) were Fujiyama Minister of Foreign Affairs and MacArthur rice ambassador to Japan, and were found. There are no initials by own handwriting on January 6, 60 both, and it seems a copy of an original document. Many denied documents are found about whether there was agreement of the recognition between the Japan and U.S. that passage of territorial waters and a stop of a transit of nuclear weapons ship are excluded from a target of a charitable work by "record of discussion", and it seems in fact said that there was disagreement of recognition.
◇ Knowledgeable person committee In "exchange of notes" which attaches to Japan-US Security Treaty of a revise for 60 years, "The important change in arrangement to Japan of U.S. military and the important change in equipment of the said military (omission) are made a subject of a charitable work with Japan government.", I have that. It's a problem concerning interpretation of "exchange of notes" whether a stop to Japan of American vessel equipped with a nuclear weapon is made the target of a charitable work of Japan and U.S.. "Record of" discussion which depends on Fujiyama Minister of Foreign Affairs and MacArthur ambassador was something to make the meaning of "exchange of notes" clear and became closed by an agreement of Japan and U.S.. But it's difficult to judge as evidence of "secret treaty" only by this description.
It's in 2 item C of "record of discussion", "You don't understand a charitable work to have an influence on arrangement to Japan of U.S. armed forces and the equipment, entry to territorial waters of coming of U.S. military plane and Japan of U.S. navy ship and present procedure about arriving in port to a harbor.", the Japanese side negotiator had no consciousness with the agreement that description is concerned with introduction of nuclear weapons. It seems that the U.S. government regarded a transit of nuclear weapons ship stop as applying of a charitable work, but when I negotiate, there are no traces which made the interpretation the Japanese side clearly.
"For our side, the general (means), and, the record which got the viewpoint where "bringing in" (introduction) is a target of a charitable work and argued "temporary dropping" of a ship airplane in particular also has no memory." (January 27, 68 and memo of the Fumihiko Togo North American head) Togo who carried negotiations as a security section chief is explaining so in 8 years later and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from a revise.
MacArthur ambassador recognized that a stop problem of a transit of nuclear weapons ship was important to install support of an army, 微 of a problemI knew strangeness and didn't say clearly. The Japanese side is also a document in July and August, 58, and "there is also application in the shipping which enters in Japan specially and an airplane" for a charitable work of introduction of nuclear weapons, and, a policy was written clearly and a problem was recognized.
MacArthur ambassador judged that the Japanese side couldn't help refusing when purchasing from front. Maybe I judged that the side in the US might interpret the side in the US if Japan didn't confirm the responsibility into which the contents of a charitable work are stuffed in the Japanese side which requested a system. A clear record has its back to the wall, but it's being testified that MacArthur ambassador told Prime Minister Kishi Nobusuke, Fujiyama Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yamada Hisanari vice foreign minister and Togo security section chiefs that a stop of a transit of nuclear weapons ship can't be discussed beforehand in later. I know the position of a ship where Fujiyama Minister of Foreign Affairs has a stone during negotiations "from MacArthur ambassador by an interview of Mainichi Newspapers in 81, too for no one. You can't say,", and, it's being stated that it was called. There is no stuffed argument left on record, but when thinking I got a clue, it's logical.
The Japanese side notices an idea on the USA side, maybe a request was told, but I neither request to want you to make a stop of a transit of nuclear weapons ship the subject of a charitable work formally nor take the side in the US out, and I hit upon the composition into which argument wasn't stuffed vaguely. The U.S. government got the NCND policy by which neither affirmation nor denial do existence of the nuclear weapon loaded onto a ship and an airplane. When making a stop the subject of a charitable work temporarily, no American vessel can stop at Japan any more, and Japan-U.S. Security Treaty doesn't consist any more. But when a charitable work isn't necessary to a stop of a transit of nuclear weapons ship, it's difficult from strong antinuclear feeling of a domestic opinion to install clear understanding from the Japanese side. When USA requests it clearly, there is a fear that security revise negotiations suffer a setback. Agreement of the recognition that it's difficult to argue a problem from the front, it seems to have had that.
When making it ambiguous, how does it correspond or isn't it found by the material I tell whether an answer was built up in the government by the Diet? Though there was no clear agreement, Akagi Munenori Minister of State for Defense did the answer the agreement that a charitable work is made the target is.
"Japan and U.S., being the problem that a movement doesn't stick in military way politically respectively for both, and when being done, I pursued neither the side in the US nor our side too far and came today." (同 and memo of the Togo North American head) "I don't pursue too far." it's done each other while being ambiguous. A transit of nuclear weapons ship may stop at a port without charitable works, Japanese Government, well something of it may be denied officially, but I don't protest each other. Such "tacit agreement" was being finished at the time of a security revise.After Odaira Minister of Foreign Affairs on April 3, 63 (mama) and Reischauer ambassador talk with to harden. Prime Minister Ikeda Hayato was the Diet and a stop of a transit of nuclear weapons ship spoke about the gist which isn't admitted, and the side in the US held sense of crisis. Reischauer ambassador reported "He reached the mutual understanding for which it's enough to go the interpretation current as of USA along perfectly." after meeting, but Johnson rice ambassador to Japan explained "For Odaira minister, what (He wasn't here.), can, if, a view couldn't be described." in later according to Togo's memo. An important thing could do agreement of interpretation at the Ohira Reischauer meeting, but Japanese Government is you informed of interpretation on the side in the US clearly, and that I found a possibility that stops without charitable works of a transit of nuclear weapons ship are performed high and didn't take exception actually. Prime Minister Sato Eisaku seems to have been introduced from Reischauer ambassador and not to have taken exception on December 29, 64 according to Togo's memo, too. You presume Reischauer ambassador that to have continued the stops without charitable works of a transit of nuclear weapons ship without being particular about responding to questions in the Diet of the Japanese side.
But a government, "A stop of a transit of nuclear weapons ship is made the target of a charitable work.", explaining was continued by the Diet. By the explanation which is dishonest because I know interpretation on the side in the US, "Because there are no charitable works, a nuclear weapon isn't be equipped with.", even if it's thought to pass the buck around USA, it's inevitable. "Record of" discussion different from the side in the US in interpretation can't be explained officially, by a successive generations government answer, "", I kept thrusting at an obvious lie.
"The external situation which can be put around Japan some, that (well, Rui) continues the present viewpoint until the 如 (every) putting condition with the big fluctuation occurs to recognition of nuclear problem in the country, without other ones" (同 and memo of the Togo North American head) this memo is used for the explanation to that, the successive generations Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the Kaifu political power can be even confirmed. It was also to maintain "tacit agreement" with USA after introduction of a three nonnuclear principle in 68, and it hardened.
But, various testimony and documentary discovery quivered "tacit agreement". Laroque retirement rice navy general officer testified "When a transit of nuclear weapons ship put in Japan by its experience, a nuclear weapon wasn't lowered." by American Congress in September, 74.
"You have to be admitted an important government distrust and the fear large to which 困乱 of domestic politics (mama) is invited since pulling it, and establish a considerable measure urgently." (October 21, 74 and memo of the Nobuo Matsunaga treaty head) Odaira Minister of Finance (former foreign minister) receives Laroque testimony and considers to consult with Prime Minister Tanaka Kakuei and remove a stop and passage of a transit of nuclear weapons ship from a target of a charitable work. Understanding and cooperation of the Ford president of the United States who visited Japan were asked. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is a stone.The concept of bringing in to Japan of a weapon" is made clear, and passage of territorial waters (territorial airspace) of our simple country and the case that a stop isn't included in this temporarily "are fixed", I put the most emphasis to do and considered, but an eye on a day wasn't judged from Tanaka prime minister resignation in December.
Reischauer former ambassador affirms "the understanding by which it's USA that a stop of a transit of nuclear weapons ship doesn't hit bringing in of a nuclear weapon and says applying of a charitable work" by an interview of Mainichi Newspapers in May, 81. A government didn't go out on reconsideration, but many people became going to feel unnaturalness of the explanation. In 91, a Busch government in the US decides about removal of a tactical nuclear weapon from a ship and an airplane. A stop problem of a transit of nuclear weapons ship wasn't the problem which disturbs real relations between Japan and the United States any more by this. Existence of "record of discussion" was pointed out by opening to the public of an American official document in 90 's.
A secret treaty of a broad sense as "tacit agreement" was between the Japan and U.S. two governments, and it appeared at the time of a security revise and hardened in 60 's. The explanation of Japanese Government does the dishonest explanation including a lie from beginning to end, and isn't supposed to match from the angle of the promotion of democracy's principle and national diplomacy. To adjust between the reality of the nuclear deterrent strategy which can be put under the free cold war and the antinuclear feeling of Japan people will take the circumstances which weren't easy into consideration, and should be debated.
<2> secret treaty about a battle campaign in case of Korean Peninsula emergency I say that the undisclosed document which makes the things which admit a battle campaign of U.S. forces in Korean Peninsula emergency without charitable works by security revise negotiations in 60 the contents (so-called "bank minute" or "Korean memorandum") may exist.
"Korean minutes" by Fujiyama Aiichiro Minister of Foreign Affairs found this time and MacArthur rice ambassador to Japan prepare for Korean Peninsula emergency and propose from the side in the US. The Japanese side was also based on influence to Japanese defense and concerned with negotiations, and both recognized as "secret treaty". In Japan, "Japan is involved in the war U.S. forces has begun.", there was a security revise con in a background.
But this secret treaty lapsed actually with Okinawa return agreement in 69. Japan "also makes the U.S. military base use in Okinawa the subject of a charitable work", it's because Prime Minister Sato Eisaku met with negotiations by a policy and expressed a prompt attitude decision concerning a charitable work officially. A well informed person committee concluded "It was something in the past." by the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty re-definition which made more North Korean nuclear crisis in the first half in 90 's a trigger.
◇ The Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2 made copies of "the minutes which are for a security conference conference the 1st time" (Korean minutes) and documents it seems (only English) were Fujiyama Minister of Foreign Affairs and MacArthur rice ambassador to Japan, and were found.There are no initials by own handwriting on January 6, 60, and a date seems an original copy both. The Japanese side was to express externally about the correspondence when being a Korean emergency, by joint statement of Prime Minister Sato and Nixon president of the United States in case of Okinawa return negotiations, and I intended to change this case document.
◇ Knowledgeable person committee When I made the "battle campaign" the United States forces in Japan do from Japan the subject of a charitable work by "bank hauteur exchange of notes" in case of a security revise in 60, Japan and U.S. agreed. When both countries were Korean Peninsula emergency at the same time by closed "Korean minutes", when the United States forces in Japan could sally without Japanese Government and a charitable work, it was confirmed by this investigation that I agreed.
After Prime Minister Kishi Nobusuke talked with MacArthur ambassadors by starting of security treaty revise negotiations, "Japan has" to avoid increasing in the danger involved in a war above more than the current state at the meeting only of the Japanese side attendant, I accentuated with (on October 4, 58, "the Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs stayed in Tokyo, ambassador meeting 録 in the US"). The Japanese side was overlooked by the policy with (the same month for 2 days "basic policy about a security adjustment (plan)") "U.S. forces makes something to discuss with Japanese Government beforehand when using a (United States forces in Japan) base like a strategy to handle an invasion to the Far East area besides Japan,". Both countries reached agreement on a final plan of "bank hauteur exchange of notes" on June 26, 59.
But, MacArthur ambassador points out that an ordinary strategy will be a situation of "variety" when the communizing side resumes a battle at Korean Peninsula, at the next month's meeting. I asked to limit to Korean Peninsula emergency and gather a closed document.
MacArthur ambassador forms the appointment I have to discuss beforehand into the Japanese side and doesn't get it "" at the meeting, and, while I referred to the necessity which sallies without charitable works, Prime Minister Kishi, "It was heard for the first time, let's study.", I met with (on July 6, 59, "the Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs stayed in Tokyo, ambassador meeting 録 in the US").
It's opposite at the viewpoint with the--by which the domestic effect of the exchange of notes is decreased about the avoided (2) charitable work that the Japanese side leaves a (1) confidential document. The negotiations which gather Korean minutes had a rough passage, were continued by Fujiyama Minister of Foreign Affairs and MacArthur ambassador every day from the second half November and agreed on December 23. A final plan sentence, January 6, 60, Fujiyama Minister of Foreign Affairs and MacArthur ambassador, initials signed their name.
MacArthur ambassador "When military of U.S. forces don't initiate a military battle strategy from Japan immediately at Korean Peninsula, the situation from which the armed attack which violated cease-fire deal can't be turned away can cause a unit of the UN forces." An example in Fujiyama Minister of Foreign Affairs "emergencyYou can use Japanese facilities and lot for the battle campaign it'll be necessary to do immediately by the United States forces in Japan so that a counterattack of the UN forces may become possible to the offensive by the violation of cease-fire deal as external measure,", ( "Korean minutes") Even when Japan changed the side in the US with non-LDP party political power, there is a possibility that I was particular about preparing for Korean Peninsula emergency and exchanging a promised document until the end. Situation in the Korean Peninsula also has the recognition that Japan is important for its safety in the Japanese side, and it's thought to be going to agree after all. It's certain that I also admitted a rice Department of State document in 74 the "secret treaty" proposed from the side in the US first and had understanding that the Japanese side parties concerned of negotiations and a bank government were also entrusted with the character of the secret treaty.
In 69, that Prime Minister Sato answers to Korean Peninsula emergency with a charitable work affirmatively in case of Okinawa return, foreign, I thought Korean minutes to change and negotiated with the side in the US by expressing. "I have to receive conference of course in the battle campaign stolen from an own country territory as sovereign nation." and, from the view point of.
The Aichi Kiichi Minister of Foreign Affairs " (Prime minister statement.) I'd like to promise the same thing as to exempt a charitable work actually." Meyer rice ambassador to Japan "It's difficult to accept something below the understanding in 60." (on July 17, 69, "Aichi minister about Okinawa return problem and Meyer rice ambassador meeting") After that Takemi Shimoda Ambassador to U.S.A is an official telegram to the Aichi Minister of Foreign Affairs on September 19, "It's being something an expression of joint statement should meet mostly as the side in the US, so, it's the large number in the Department of State that you don't have to make a secret agreement.", a remark of a fin rice Department of State Japanese chief director will be reported. By the joint statement which are Prime Minister Sato and Nixon president of the United States on November 21, "A prime minister told Korean safety that Japan was important for its safety.", clear writing. Prime Minister Sato also stated "the policy which decides about the attitude promptly positively to a charitable work as Japanese Government (in case in case of Korean Peninsula emergency)" by a speech. The side in the US estimated Prime Minister Sato's one-sided statement, but clear determination wasn't put between the Japan and U.S. concerning the validity of the Korean minutes.
After a Japanese prime minister expressed the previous attitude, I can't think the side in the US plans for base use without charitable works, and Korean minutes may be thought to have lapsed actually. Actually, Korean minutes were something in the past with a Japan-U.S. alliance relation's becoming close a situation way around the guideline for Japan-U.S. defense cooperation (guideline) and 99 years in 97.

http://mainichi.jp/select/world/news/20100310ddm010010137000c.html